Re:“No Defense of the Indefensible”: L.A. Judge Makes Landma...
by insert_coin on Sunday April 25, 2021 @06:45PM
(#26937439)
The US was a common law country, then created the constitution based on that common law and now it is a constitutional republic. The constitution is the pillar now not "common law".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“No Defense of the Indefensible”: L.A. Judge Makes Landma...
by giantg2 on Sunday April 25, 2021 @06:54PM
(#26937498)
I think he means they accept common law doctrines as part of the law. For example, malicious prosecution is not a statute (in some states) but can still be prosecuted (I forget if they handle it civilly or criminally) under common law doctrine.
Re:“No Defense of the Indefensible”: L.A. Judge Makes Landma...
by PeterWhittaker on Sunday April 25, 2021 @08:16PM
(#26938036)
Essentially.
The constitution is the floor the stool sits on, and it supports common law both implicitly (cf, e.g., [1]), and explicitly (cf the 7th Amendment).
[1] https://constitutionalism.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/common-la...