Re:Clever Hack Finds Mystery CPU Instructions
by jshmrsn on Saturday April 24, 2021 @07:32AM
(#26924134)
While I certainly have no need to find undocumented x86 instructions, I do find this style of explanation great learning a bit about how processors work (something I would like to learn more about).
Re:Clever Hack Finds Mystery CPU Instructions
by colejohnson66 on Saturday April 24, 2021 @02:45PM
(#26927315)
Yes, but also: the update file doesn’t contain everything, but just what needs changing. So if these undocumented ones aren’t in the file, that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
Re:Clever Hack Finds Mystery CPU Instructions
by simcop2387 on Saturday April 24, 2021 @10:09AM
(#26924927)
I like the phrase "hugged to death" as a more generic version of "slashdotted" personally. It's a shame but /. is no longer the web powerhouse that it used to be, though I still read it regularly just because it will sometimes have stories and things I don't otherwise find in places like reddit or hn.
Re:Clever Hack Finds Mystery CPU Instructions
by anaganisk on Saturday April 24, 2021 @02:01PM
(#26926933)
Contrary to popular belief, HN traffic is not as huge as people think for the hug of death. Its the reddit traffic, when people either repost or post at both places. HN can barely send 5 users per second, which can surely be handled by a potato.
The linked article loaded very, very slow. Original (?) bloppost: https://blog.can.ac/2021/03/22/speculating-x86-64-isa-with-o...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26584118
https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/sandsifter