News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by bitwize on Friday April 23, 2021 @01:14PM (#26916888)
Yeah, I have two thinkpads -- one from 2010 and one from 2012. Both of them have enough grunt to get through most any task, the heaviest of which is compiling large codebases. One of them was my daily driver for eight years; I only upgraded to a Ryzen because I wanted MOAR COARS and more RAM.

It's funny how today's computers could theoretically handle a user's workload for decades yet Apple builds them to fall apart after four years. There was a Hackernews story recently about a guy faffing around with old 68k Macs from the late 80s, he said that those old Macs were rated by Apple to last for fifteen years. And yet they come from an era of much more rapid utility decay for computer hardware, when a computer would be utterly obsolete after just a few years.

Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by pdimitar on Saturday April 24, 2021 @07:10AM (#26924024)
I think you might be going to the other extreme just by a tiiiiiiiny bit. :D

It's true that a lot of people are just fine with a a 10-year old i5 or an i7. Hell, a lot of store owners and front-end offices grumble at an i3 CPU because it's still too powerful for the daily activities of the staff.

But when it comes to routinely compiling C / C++ / Rust then you need all the power and hardware innovation you can get.

Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by oriolid on Friday April 23, 2021 @02:40PM (#26917741)
This would be more convincing if I wasn't reading it on a 2013 Macbook. But yes, Big Sur is the last major update available and in a few years it's going to be obsolete.
Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by anthk on Friday April 23, 2021 @04:09PM (#26918669)
TBH a 68040 mac would be useful in 1999.