Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model
by ethbr0 on Friday April 23, 2021 @07:45AM
(#26913698)
Originally, my memory says "i7 meant 4+ core & hyper threading", "i5 meant 4 cores w/o HT", "i3 meant 2 cores (with or without HT)".
But I'm sure even at the beginning there were SKUs that broke the coding due to customer demand.
Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model
by jandrese on Friday April 23, 2021 @02:48PM
(#26917839)
I think the lesson here is that Intel's marketing for these chips has been a mess from day one.
Some of it is inevitable, they have too many aspects to contain in a reasonable product name, but letting the names become divorced from any sort of reality helps nobody.
Edit: nope, actually, I'm wrong - Core i5-430M was a straight dual core, no hyperthreading part.