News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by gambiting on Friday April 23, 2021 @06:49AM (#26913297)
Mobile i5s always had hyperthreading from the beginning.

Edit: nope, actually, I'm wrong - Core i5-430M was a straight dual core, no hyperthreading part.

Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by ethbr0 on Friday April 23, 2021 @07:45AM (#26913698)
Originally, my memory says "i7 meant 4+ core & hyper threading", "i5 meant 4 cores w/o HT", "i3 meant 2 cores (with or without HT)".

But I'm sure even at the beginning there were SKUs that broke the coding due to customer demand.

Re:Apple’s M1 Positioning Mocks the Entire x86 Business Model by jandrese on Friday April 23, 2021 @02:48PM (#26917839)
I think the lesson here is that Intel's marketing for these chips has been a mess from day one.

Some of it is inevitable, they have too many aspects to contain in a reasonable product name, but letting the names become divorced from any sort of reality helps nobody.