News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple is sued for telling you that you're “buying” movies by soneil on Friday April 23, 2021 @06:32AM (#26913173)
While I personally agree, ownership should be explicit - their defence isn't as silly as it looks. "reasonable belief" is an actual mechanism in english law (the system, not the nation), and the learned behaviours of "buy it on Kindle", "buy it on Steam", etc, do support it.

It's essentially the "times have changed" argument; that the common nomenclature for "purchase a non-exclusive license with no fixed term" is "buy a copy", and "purchase a non-exclusive licence with a fixed term" is "rent a copy". And if that is true for the vast majority of consumers, the argument does hold weight.

Re:Apple is sued for telling you that you're “buying” movies by josephcsible on Friday April 23, 2021 @09:51AM (#26914756)
When you rent something, you're supposed to be told very clearly up front when your last day when the thing is.
Re:Apple is sued for telling you that you're “buying” movies by fastball on Friday April 23, 2021 @03:15PM (#26918120)
Isn't that the distinction though? A rental has a clear end date, enforced by Apple. A purchase does not, it can merely disappear from Apple's catalogue at some point, due to licensing issues. Apple has no idea how long that thing will be around, so they can't really quote a date your "purchase" ends.
Re:Apple is sued for telling you that you're “buying” movies by akoncius on Friday April 23, 2021 @07:16PM (#26920375)
one approach: if license expires old buyers still should be able to watch that movie and license expiration could be applied only on new sales.

on the other hand, apple is well educated how industry works and they are well aware that purchase is not full ownership of copy so you could interpret it as intentional attempt to mislead customers.

Re:Apple is sued for telling you that you're “buying” movies by amelius on Friday April 23, 2021 @02:51PM (#26917873)
Sadly, the vast majority of consumers totally expects to be ripped off in one way or another. So, yes indeed.