Facebook deliberately made people sad. This ought to be the final straw (2012)

Re:Facebook deliberately made people sad. This ought to be t... by plaidfuji on Saturday April 17, 2021 @05:34PM (#26847640)

To be fair, the article states that the study was designed by a data scientist. Not that that implies that any additional ethical considerations were taken into account.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook deliberately made people sad. This ought to be t... by seattledev on Saturday April 17, 2021 @07:02PM (#26848209)

Data scientist means someone who's had classes in stats and knows how to use software to analyze data. They don't cover how to run experiment and don't cover ethics

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook deliberately made people sad. This ought to be t... by urthor on Saturday April 17, 2021 @09:06PM (#26848888)

To be fair, the profile of a data scientist at a F500 non tech company and at a company like FB is slightly different. Facebook's data science crew is known for being heavier on the stats lighter on the software (relatively speaking) and probably can design a good experiment.

That said, anyone who signs up for a job at Facebook doesn't give a shit about ethical design of experiments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook deliberately made people sad. This ought to be t... by mgraczyk on Saturday April 17, 2021 @09:16PM (#26848943)

Hi, I used to work on ML and ran experiments like this one at FB. Just want to point out that the effect of experiments like this on an individual is smaller than the effect of making the app start 0.1 seconds faster, or retraining the network used to filter hate speech. The only reason the effect is significant is because N>650k, so tiny effect sizes can be detected.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook deliberately made people sad. This ought to be t... by thatcat on Sunday April 18, 2021 @01:13AM (#26849973)

whats the variance on that effect?? doesn't a large data set like that just lead to type ii errors?

[ Parent | on HN ]