News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Opting Your Website Out of Google's FLoC Network by wyager on Friday April 16, 2021 @02:30AM (#26830315)
Web server software should absolutely not add a bunch of garbage to work around some ad company's shenanigans.
Re:Opting Your Website Out of Google's FLoC Network by yarcob on Friday April 16, 2021 @03:00AM (#26830504)
Pretty much all network code has workarounds or default configurations that work around problems with specific clients.

I guess this topic is more of a political issue rather than an obvious compatiblity issue, so it's not as clear cut.

But adding special code to deal with buggy clients is something everyone has to do sooner or later.

Re:Opting Your Website Out of Google's FLoC Network by ben174 on Friday April 16, 2021 @02:42AM (#26830403)
They shouldn't have to, but there are several examples of where it's the software author who has take action in order to put a stop to it.

Not an Apple fanboy, but Safari is a great example of software which has changed its default behavior to prevent creepy things from happening.

Re:Opting Your Website Out of Google's FLoC Network by NicoJuicy on Friday April 16, 2021 @03:43AM (#26830794)
Safari is also a great example of a browser to keep the app store relevant ( outside of games)

Different companies, different incentives

Re:Opting Your Website Out of Google's FLoC Network by zentiggr on Friday April 16, 2021 @10:30AM (#26834335)
If Google is going to shift to using almost unblockable tracking calculations, then servers are the next most logical place to push back against it.

Anyone who runs a site and wants to opt in against a default block should have to take extra action to reduce their visitors privacy, and should be called out for their behavior. As others have noted, there are already plenty of workarounds in use for many reasons... this is a BETTER reason than most.