Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress

Re:Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress by devmunchies on Thursday April 15, 2021 @04:12PM (#26825554)

> right-wing conspiracies based on outright fabrications

maybe on that one point, but the fact the democrats trade way more on the markets is not a conspiracy theory, it's an outright conspiracy.

why are you defending these people? because they're democrats on paper?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress by allturtles on Thursday April 15, 2021 @04:43PM (#26825886)

I believe GP is defending facts against malicious lies. That seems always a good thing, regardless of whom the lies are directed towards.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress by ABeeSea on Thursday April 15, 2021 @06:37PM (#26827049)

Yes, exactly. This is the kind of obviously disprovable lie that I though wouldn’t fly on HN.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress by devmunchies on Friday April 16, 2021 @03:38PM (#26838218)

> malicious lies

just call it a lie. don't need biased adjectives.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unusual Stock Trading by Whales in US Congress by ABeeSea on Saturday April 17, 2021 @07:11AM (#26843353)

I don’t think that’s a biased adjective. It describes the author’s intent in distributing an easily disprovable lie. Their intent was malicious.

[ Parent | on HN ]