At that point you might as well pitch migrating the tech stack to .net
For me recent means JDK 14 or later.
And I have trouble crediting the idea that moving to openjdk is anywhere near the effort to move to a completely different language+platform, even if there are differences.
My second point was a joke, still I wouldn't be the one to rock the boat. If anything is even slightly off after switching to open JDK you'd need to justify it
Once upon a time maybe, but today:
> A copy of the latest OpenJDK comes bundled with Android Studio 2.2 and higher, and this is the JDK version we recommend you use for your Android projects.
- https://developer.android.com/studio/intro/studio-config#jdk
> If anything is even slightly off after switching to open JDK you'd need to justify it
"We don't have to license it from Oracle" should justify a lot.
I thought that was just the obvious path; why would companies not like it?