Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a...
by Robotbeat on Monday April 12, 2021 @08:56PM
(#26787023)
Not that I'm aware of. But I do know others in the industry have changed their minds, like for instance RocketLab. Peter Beck, who said that if they ever were going to make a reusable rocket he'd eat his hat, actually did announce a reusable rocket and later did actually eat (part of) his hat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agqxJw5ISdk&t=188s
(Love that he actually did it haha!)
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a...
by 2rsf on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @03:37AM
(#26789220)
so did the ESA European Space Agency with their Themis project [1]
[1] https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2020/12/Themis
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a...
by Robotbeat on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @09:41AM
(#26791980)
Yup, I’m a fan although disappointed they have only announced the testbed instead of an orbital rocket.
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a...
by 908B64B197 on Monday April 12, 2021 @09:30PM
(#26787220)
> I worked at ULA for a year about five years ago. At that time they were arguing that it wasn't going to be cost effective.
When you sell the rocket and not the launch on cost plus contract, it's indeed not cost-effective.
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a...
by Robotbeat on Monday April 12, 2021 @09:58PM
(#26787389)
ULA did and has done mostly fixed price contracts. (This is different than, say, the SLS contract.)
But ULA was stuck with their approach for several reasons, only a couple of which were in their control.
I worked at ULA for a year about five years ago. At that time they were arguing that it wasn't going to be cost effective. Back then though there may have been one or two SpaceX landings.
since I left I haven't kept up with this debate at all. Do you know if ULA changed their stance after all the successful launches?