News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a... by Robotbeat on Monday April 12, 2021 @06:41PM (#26786088)
Fiducials don’t need to be ON the road. They can be on signage or whatever. But fiducials are cheap. Just paint. (And you can, in fact, draw them by hand using a ruler, a square, and patience.)

They are error-detecting and error-correcting digital signage that gives you precision 6dof orientation “for free.” (And you can do even better... can stick a bunch of them all over a deformable object to map back the shape and deformation.... without lengthy registration and with only a single camera... unlike vidicon) And they’re easy to implement in software. Can be extremely fast (<10ms... no real limit as you can implement it in an FPGA) and fairly lightweight and can use basically any kind of digital camera (good or bad).

Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a... by ssivark on Monday April 12, 2021 @11:53PM (#26787966)
Are there such fiducials+libraries available today?
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a... by Robotbeat on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @01:59AM (#26788562)
You can use almost any 2D matrix barcode as a fiducial, and those include error correction/detection already. Signing it would be easy.
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a... by ssivark on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @02:45AM (#26788868)
I’m familiar with ARUCOs, but in my experience they tend to be somewhat finicky (Eg: mid-identified with a little bit of noise or unfavorable lighting), and accurate poses tend to require a lot more fiducial markers than might be considered “reasonable”.
Re:Ask HN: What under-the-radar technology are you excited a... by Robotbeat on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @08:54AM (#26791493)
The standard Aruco library in openCV is not the most stable fiducial tracking. But there are lots to choose from