Would someone who paints photographs for you in the style of Van Gogh's Starry Night also be "cheap?"

Particularly if their website were called "StarryNightPhotos.com" and they clearly said on their site "these are painted in the style of Van Gogh?"

Because that's all this is. And there are plenty of AI sites that do exactly what I just said but poorly, and probably plenty of artists with a side-job of doing something like that better.

I would call the second or third person copying what he's doing "cheap", I wouldn't call what he's doing cheap.

Tolkien is 50 years dead, The Hobbit's copyright expires in 10 years. I think it's fine.