Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by I_am_tiberius on Thursday April 08, 2021 @10:13AM
(#26738894)
I wouldn't say Netlify has free unlimited scale. There are some limitations, especially the data transfer limit of 100GB.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by rory on Thursday April 08, 2021 @10:36AM
(#26739237)
That's right, I'm exaggerating. At current rates I'll hit that limit at 7.5MM pageviews/month.
I've also paid for extra builds once or twice in the past (automatically charges a few dollars when you cross the build time limit), and I pay them $9/mo for analytics.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by I_am_tiberius on Thursday April 08, 2021 @01:13PM
(#26741305)
Are you happy with their analytics? I have no experience with website analytics but I find their offering a bit too minimalistic. I wish for the following features:
- Break down page views into unique visiters for all views (per site, per country etc.). (or some other comparison between those).
- Don't lose the history after 30 days.
- Export to .xlsx
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by rory on Thursday April 08, 2021 @01:32PM
(#26741532)
Agreed, they're extremely mediocre, but worth $9 to me. Seems like they have better analytics available at a "custom" price, which I assume would be quite expensive. For my use case, minimal analytics at a minimal price works fine.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by modeless on Thursday April 08, 2021 @12:43PM
(#26740939)
Free unlimited scale does exist though. Cloudflare has no bandwidth limit for free plans, and it pairs well with App Engine.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by remram on Thursday April 08, 2021 @12:46PM
(#26740984)
How much is 1MM? I'm unfamiliar with that suffix.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by jeffreyrogers on Thursday April 08, 2021 @12:51PM
(#26741043)
1 million
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by zests on Thursday April 08, 2021 @02:05PM
(#26741855)
M == thousand
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by everybodyknows on Friday April 09, 2021 @01:52PM
(#26753695)
M does happen to be the Roman numeral for “thousand” — as seen in the credits of old movies. But let’s not go there.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by remram on Thursday April 08, 2021 @08:16PM
(#26745374)
k = thousand, M = million, G = billion
There is actually a standard for this. I'm fine with MM, it's confusing to me but not ambiguous, just please don't reassign existing prefixes...
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by lupire on Thursday April 08, 2021 @03:52PM
(#26742979)
This is a false-cognate in MM.
MM means millions, plural of M which means million.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by antonvs on Friday April 09, 2021 @05:54PM
(#26756661)
Source? Every source I've seen says that MM is derived from the Roman numeral M, meaning thousand.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by remram on Friday April 09, 2021 @06:51PM
(#26757183)
Wouldn't that make MM 2,000, the same way II is 2 and XX is 20?
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by antonvs on Friday April 09, 2021 @07:59PM
(#26757629)
It would be if it was interpreted as an actual Roman number. But in this case it's treated as M x M.
The actual Roman version of a million is an M with a bar over it, where the bar means x1000. But that's not an ordinary character, so wouldn't work for this purpose.