Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by remram on Thursday April 08, 2021 @12:46PM
(#26740984)
How much is 1MM? I'm unfamiliar with that suffix.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by jeffreyrogers on Thursday April 08, 2021 @12:51PM
(#26741043)
1 million
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by zests on Thursday April 08, 2021 @02:05PM
(#26741855)
M == thousand
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by everybodyknows on Friday April 09, 2021 @01:52PM
(#26753695)
M does happen to be the Roman numeral for “thousand” — as seen in the credits of old movies. But let’s not go there.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by remram on Thursday April 08, 2021 @08:16PM
(#26745374)
k = thousand, M = million, G = billion
There is actually a standard for this. I'm fine with MM, it's confusing to me but not ambiguous, just please don't reassign existing prefixes...
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by lupire on Thursday April 08, 2021 @03:52PM
(#26742979)
This is a false-cognate in MM.
MM means millions, plural of M which means million.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by antonvs on Friday April 09, 2021 @05:54PM
(#26756661)
Source? Every source I've seen says that MM is derived from the Roman numeral M, meaning thousand.
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by remram on Friday April 09, 2021 @06:51PM
(#26757183)
Wouldn't that make MM 2,000, the same way II is 2 and XX is 20?
Re:The architecture behind a one-person tech startup
by antonvs on Friday April 09, 2021 @07:59PM
(#26757629)
It would be if it was interpreted as an actual Roman number. But in this case it's treated as M x M.
The actual Roman version of a million is an M with a bar over it, where the bar means x1000. But that's not an ordinary character, so wouldn't work for this purpose.