A comically bad attempt at murder is still attempted murder.
Some of those setups discriminate based on ethnicity, such as those that target Islamic radicals and black nationalists. In my mind, this further deepens the ethical quandary.
Sometimes a solution in search of a problem is itself a problem.
"...the FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs) have approached multiple activists organizing for justice for George Floyd—who was killed by Minneapolis police officers—and have alternatively attempted to entrap them or pushed them to work as informants."
http://hrlr.law.columbia.edu/hrlr-online/the-anatomy-of-a-fe...
I suspect that because criminals tend to ignore the law anyway, placing restrictions on pornography will completely fail to reduce any harm as bad people will continue to do those things regardless of whether PornHub exists or not
If pornography were not legal, then production would move underground and would probably involve even more harm.
Some might suggest that there needs to be heavier regulation and more protection for the women involved but banning porn would mean zero protection for the women and an unregulated trade
And pornographers did much, much worse. They trafficked underage women, misrepresented the contracts, routinely provided drugs to dull their actors' senses, and engaged in all kinds of underhanded or outright criminal conduct.
The guy who made (super mild by today's standards) Girls Gone Wild videos has a whole Criminal section in his wiki bio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Francis#Criminal
Here's GirlsDoPorn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GirlsDoPorn#Legal_action
And these are the "legitimate" ones who can be sued.