News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by dan-robertson on Sunday April 04, 2021 @06:48AM (#26688374)
Maritime insurance doesn’t usually cover some freak weather (acts of God). It is too risky for the insurer to have large amounts of their book exposed to the same event. I’m not sure if this sandstorm counts as an act of God, but $1B to Egypt for a canal blockage probably pales in comparison to the claims that might be made against late-delivery insurance. It is probably those claims which insurers are most worried about, and those claims which they want to dismiss as due to acts of God (but the cause of “ship blocking canal” feels to me even less like an act of God than “big sandstorm”)
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by varispeed on Sunday April 04, 2021 @07:33AM (#26688623)
If this is an "act of God", should they seek damages from Church instead?
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by ben509 on Sunday April 04, 2021 @05:05PM (#26692830)
The Church would then refer them to Genesis 3:6, which led to the decision in Genesis 3:16-19, as that breach of covenant by mankind is the original cause of our continuing hardship. They'd then go ahead and cite all the additional breaches of covenant.
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by tzs on Sunday April 04, 2021 @08:25AM (#26688886)
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by darkwater on Sunday April 04, 2021 @07:10AM (#26688484)
Is this "act of God" terminology really used in, I guess, US insurances?
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by ramchip on Sunday April 04, 2021 @07:15AM (#26688511)
It's standard terminology, yes. A quick google would lead you to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_God
Re:Egypt demands over $1B in damages after Suez Canal blockage by LudwigNagasena on Sunday April 04, 2021 @07:25AM (#26688570)
It is used in the Anglo-American legal system.