> sentinel values
Using in-band signaling always involves the risk of misinterpreting types.
> This is part of more general problem
DWIM ("Do What I Mean") was a terrible way to handle typos and spelling errors when Warren Teitelman tried it at Xerox PARC[1] over 50 years ago. From[2]:
>> In one notorious incident, Warren added a DWIM feature to the command interpreter used at Xerox PARC. One day another hacker there typed
delete *$
>> to free up some disk space. (The editor there named backup files by appending $ to the original file name, so he was trying to delete any backup files left over from old editing sessions.) It happened that there weren't any editor backup files, so DWIM helpfully reported *$ not found, assuming you meant 'delete *'
>> [...] The disgruntled victim later said he had been sorely tempted to go to Warren's office, tie Warren down in his chair in front of his workstation, and then type 'delete *$' twice.Trying to "automagically" interpret or fix input is always a terrible idea because you cannot discover the actual intent of an author from the text they wrote. In literary criticism they call this problem "Death of the Author"[3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DWIM
[2] http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/D/DWIM.html
[3] https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DeathOfTheAuthor
Ironically, this did not render the way you intended because HN interpreted the asterisk as an emphasis marker in this line.
It works here:
... type 'delete *$' twice.
because the line is indented and so renders as code, but not here:> ... type 'delete $' twice.
because the subsequent line has emphasized text*. So the scoping of the asterisks is all screwed up.
Which can be a fun game, but is ultimately pointless.
x == “00.10”
You’ll get a type error that x is a decimal and the string literal is a string. So then you know you have to reimport it in the right way. So the type system told you that an assumption was violated.
This won’t always happen, though. E.g. sort by this field will happily do a decimal sort instead of the string 00.10.
The best approach is to ask the user at import time “here is my guess, feel free to correct me”. Excel/Inflex have this opportunity, but YAML doesn’t.
That is, aside from explicit schemas. Mostly, we don’t have a schema.
So that system is not consistent with type checking? How is this not considered a bug?
Types only help if you pick the right ones.
The more general problem basically being sentinel values (which these sorts of inferences can be treated as) in stringly-typed contexts: if everything is a string and you match some of those for special consideration, you will eventually match them in a context where that's wholly incorrect, and break something.