Re:Suppressing a gene by using its antibody can lead to toot...
by mjewkes on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @11:21PM
(#26643165)
Where have we seen this? Genuine question.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Suppressing a gene by using its antibody can lead to toot...
by ArkanExplorer on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @12:56AM
(#26643675)
Re:Suppressing a gene by using its antibody can lead to toot...
by Joeri on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @01:50AM
(#26643945)
Not exactly an example, but the pharma industry has shown a complete lack of interest in pursuing phage therapy, even though it could help solve the problem of antibiotic resistance, because phages cannot be patented.
Re:Suppressing a gene by using its antibody can lead to toot...
by samat on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @02:01AM
(#26643986)
I’ve heard phage therapy is very individual and cannot be scaled as a reason for slow adoption.
Re:Suppressing a gene by using its antibody can lead to toot...
by jtsiskin on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @01:23AM
(#26643808)
I don’t have a specific example of openly stopping production of a cure, but it’s hard to imagine that research isn’t shaped by this profit drive:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/goldman-asks-is-curing-patie...
If the profit incentive was removed (let’s say government paid same flat rate for a lifetime supply of treatment, whether it be a cure or a reoccurring pill) I have no doubt more cures would be discovered
Re:Suppressing a gene by using its antibody can lead to toot...
by 0-_-0 on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @05:15AM
(#26645059)
Anecdotal, but I heard it from a reasearcher working in pharma that the company stopped developing a drug that cured some condition that another branch of the company had a treatment for.