Re:The Future of Perl
by petepete on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:30AM
(#26565826)
I did a fair amount of Perl just over a decade ago but can't really see any situation where I'd reach for it over Ruby now. Ruby has Perl's text manipulation goodness with a saner syntax.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Future of Perl
by blacktriangle on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:33AM
(#26565845)
Performance.
Perl was a legit tool in bioinformatics due to its insane text parsing performance. Ruby performance is absolute garbage.
Re:The Future of Perl
by phone8675309 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:29AM
(#26567677)
I learned Perl in the mid 2000s because I was working with a company that took text (and sometimes spreadsheet) dumps of public records data and processed them into a database. The entire ETL pipeline was a set of Perl scripts, and, as far as I know, that system is still running. The Perl iteration was actually the second iteration of that system - the first iteration was a set of C programs and shell scripts that were replaced over time.
The rich ecosystem of tested Perl modules for file formats along with the testing frameworks made coping with change bearable - not enjoyable, but bearable.
Re:The Future of Perl
by blacktriangle on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:37AM
(#26567777)
Oh man the ecosystem. I still think CPAN set the bar for what a high-quality language ecosystem should look like. npm and rubygems look like amateur hour by comparison.
Re:The Future of Perl
by yabadubakta on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:13AM
(#26566151)
And ubiquity: there’s a Perl for almost all systems
I wonder for how long..
> I wonder for how long..
Is anything ever really taken out of /usr/bin once it gets in there? It may be a long long /usr/bin/time.
OpenBSD ships it by default, with Pledge support.