Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID
by Throwawayaerlei on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:53AM
(#26554971)
AZ has genuinely fucked up a couple times. They accidentally gave some trial participants half the intended dose
That was an Oxford fuck up, as were most of the other early clinical trial ones as far as we know. As others have explained, this is not a normal small organization plus Big Pharma arrangement, and after the EU went crazy I'll bet AZ is now regretting ever getting involved.
AZ's catastrophic fuck up from that testing mistake which should have burned a lot of their credibility was to use that data which in the long term didn't pan out to make a blended claim of higher efficacy than they could at that time legitimately support.
Re:AstraZeneca may have provided incomplete efficacy data NIAID
by sschueller on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:15AM
(#26554132)
I agree, stuff like that should not happen.
That's not what this means.
AZ has genuinely fucked up a couple times. They accidentally gave some trial participants half the intended dose (https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55086927), and now appear to have made a mistake in reporting data.
They're procedural fuckups. Never should've happened, but neither one inherently says "the vaccine is unsafe".