News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by mc32 on Monday March 22, 2021 @12:33PM (#26543103)
Yes but like food diet, is junk food more profitable or are staples more profitable?

What should we aim for?

If junk is more profitable, is that okay? Do we all jump on that wagon while the going is good, or do we think a minute about what is more fulfilling?

Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by pessimizer on Monday March 22, 2021 @05:54PM (#26547772)
Media outlets other than substack are also hiring terrible people, and optimizing for trash.

To me the largest difference between large corporate outlets and substack (and other reader-financed journalists) is that large corporate outlets will keep people employed for years that nobody wants to read and could never support themselves independently - journalists who are only important and interesting because of their access to the outlet. The outlets themselves keep those journalists around as pure vehicles for the opinions of their owners.

At least with these outlets, the owners are the readers. If the readers like trash, they'll pay for trash. If the owners like quality, they'll demand it. I don't have to worry about how the subject of the article will affect Bezos's net worth, or wonder how David Brooks, Maureen Dowd, or Thomas Friedman are still employed.

Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by mc32 on Monday March 22, 2021 @06:47PM (#26548429)
But still, we’re not sure that the content will be free of external influence taking advantage of the writer’s reputation.

Obviously if they peddle too many interested articles they'll likely get caught, but if they do it once in a while or take payment from opposing interests, etc., who’ll know the difference?

Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by WJW on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:27PM (#26543808)
There is no "we" here, certainly not in the sense that "do we think a minute". People can choose for themselves just fine, and they'll do so whether I wring my hands about it or not. If you want to be worried about other people, go ahead but leave me out of it. :)
Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by jeffreyrogers on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:55PM (#26544230)
Obviously trash sells and it always has ("The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience"), but some people care more about things like truth and style than they do about money.
Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by madmadjo on Monday March 22, 2021 @05:56PM (#26547794)
This is the world we're living in. Unfortunately, I can give you only one upvote...
Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by jdsully on Monday March 22, 2021 @08:55PM (#26549590)
Regardless of whether Doritos are more profitable we still have millions of acres of staple crops grown each year. There is no shortage of good writing but it may not come in microwaveable packets. If the majority of the people don't care then that's the downside to living in a free society where each has their choice.
Re:Sovereign writers and Substack by tomaskafka on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @01:46PM (#26570583)
Majority people's staples are now junk. I expect the same thing to happen in media.