Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by peripitea on Friday March 19, 2021 @08:56PM
(#26519775)
I don't follow this too closely but are you referring to company-released videos? Seems unfair to compare a compilation of bad incidents from one of many (thousands?) of users of Tesla's system to one curated by the company releasing it. I've seen a few videos of the Tesla doing 15+ minute drives without intervention too.
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by xiphias2 on Saturday March 20, 2021 @01:30PM
(#26524601)
Tesla has marketing videos as well (and great FSD Beta videos), these videos testing Tesla try to find edge cases and the hardest places to drive where it's still allowed. There are serious bugs to fix, but that doesn't mean that Cruise doesn't have them.
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by HellDunkel on Saturday March 20, 2021 @04:28AM
(#26521648)
I would be very surprised if Cruise had a better 3d rep. It is probably far worse and that is why they are hiding it.
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by jtsiskin on Saturday March 20, 2021 @05:34AM
(#26521851)
They have a lidar. They already have an accurate 3D rep from the sensors
Re:Tesla's “full self driving” beta is potentially dangerous
by HellDunkel on Saturday March 20, 2021 @05:59AM
(#26521928)
They have a startup and an unfulfilled promise. Their ADAS supercruise has no 3d view. Their self driving vehicle is no competition to tesla.
What's striking is watching the system's screen vs the real world, and seeing Tesla not detecting important things. Tesla's big problem is simply that they are not very good at building a 3D model of the world around their vehicles. They try to do it on vision alone, and, after over five years, they still can't do that reliably.