News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists discover fossil plants beneath mile-deep Green... by _Microft on Thursday March 18, 2021 @02:46AM (#26500194)
I didn’t expect live plants when reading the headline. Something becoming a fossil after being buried by a mile of ice isn’t that surprising, in my opinion? Live plants would have warranted a qualifier in my opinion.

Edit: but yes, you are of course right that adding ‘fossil’ would have made the headline clearer.

Re:Scientists discover fossil plants beneath mile-deep Green... by TeMPOraL on Thursday March 18, 2021 @07:48AM (#26501684)
If the headline said "viruses" or "bacteria" instead of "plants", I'd definitely expect they meant live ones (and also that it's time to shelter-in-place even more than I already am). Given how ancient arctic pathogens are a relatively well-known popular culture meme, I also thought the headline means live plants.
Re:Scientists discover fossil plants beneath mile-deep Green... by _Microft on Thursday March 18, 2021 @10:37AM (#26503153)
Ha, then it's just me. Though... plant-based life coming out of the cold reminds me of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_from_Another_World

Re:Scientists discover fossil plants beneath mile-deep Green... by waheoo on Thursday March 18, 2021 @03:29AM (#26500352)
Fossils aren't plants, they're rocks. Why would anyone assume you mean rocks when you say plants?
Re:Scientists discover fossil plants beneath mile-deep Green... by simonh on Thursday March 18, 2021 @06:25AM (#26501218)
"Scientists discover rocks beneath mile-deep Greenland ice" maybe isn't quite as catchy, or as useful in conveying relevant information.
Re:Scientists discover fossil plants beneath mile-deep Green... by darkerside on Thursday March 18, 2021 @08:10AM (#26501813)
But it would have the advantage of being accurate. This is why they invented words like fossil.