News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RethinkDB: why we failed (2017) by Aeolun on Saturday March 13, 2021 @01:15AM (#26444437)
Performance for my workload (writes/reads for a relatively small number of large documents) was absolutely atrocious.

To the point that retrieving data based on a secondary index (of like 10000 documents) took like 5s.

Then inserting the same documents took a significant (don’t remember the exact magnitude) amount of time as well.

By comparison mysql does the same stuff in 50ms (or less).

Everything around RethinkDB was fantastic, but I just couldn’t justify that since the basic operation was so terrible.

Re:RethinkDB: why we failed (2017) by senderista on Saturday March 13, 2021 @01:30AM (#26444505)
But, but...the data structures were all lock-free! Who cares if throughput sucked?
Re:RethinkDB: why we failed (2017) by Aeolun on Saturday March 13, 2021 @11:11AM (#26447485)
Yeah, let me just spin up a few hundred more servers. That’ll take care of the problem right quick!