News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to... by Steltek on Friday March 12, 2021 @03:40PM (#26440624)
My understanding is that a transfer orbit requires two thrusts and otherwise, with only one push, all you've done is make for an eccentric orbit that still intersects your original one.

Again, I'm ignorant of these things but it seems like depending on atmospheric drag to provide for the additional correction is risking a lot.

Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to... by TeMPOraL on Friday March 12, 2021 @06:33PM (#26442267)
It is, but the intersection point doesn't track the station. When you push an object retrograde (i.e. throw it out the back), two important things happen. One, you make it spend more time closer to Earth than it was spending before, meaning extra drag, which lowers that orbit's closest point to your orbit, ever so slightly. Two, objects in lower orbits move faster, contributing to drag, but more importantly, meaning that once you do one full orbit, the object will be somewhere else. It may still roughly intersect your orbit, but you won't be there when it does. Combining these two factors, you can give your object enough of a push that the two orbits stop intersecting before there's any risk of collision.
Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to... by pilsetnieks on Friday March 12, 2021 @06:21PM (#26442166)
The eccentric orbit is the transfer orbit but yes, you need two thrusts to go from one circular orbit to another.