Re:Twitter's Dorsey auctions first ever tweet as digital mem...
by tylerhou on Saturday March 06, 2021 @10:34AM
(#26368075)
Any evidence that this happens regularly? Often FMV of non liquid assets has to be evaluated by auction.
Re:Twitter's Dorsey auctions first ever tweet as digital mem...
by vlovich123 on Saturday March 06, 2021 @10:44AM
(#26368148)
Evaluated by whomever you pay to have it evaluated. Watch dirty money. They explain the malincentives pretty well.
Re:Twitter's Dorsey auctions first ever tweet as digital mem...
by mynegation on Saturday March 06, 2021 @12:05PM
(#26368769)
How does that work, mathematically? If you bought an asset and it appreciated you are liable for a tax on capital gains. If you donate this asset that simply eliminates the gain and the associated tax. But this is obviously a thing. Where am I wrong?
Re:Twitter's Dorsey auctions first ever tweet as digital mem...
by xur17 on Saturday March 06, 2021 @12:32PM
(#26368974)
> If you bought an asset and it appreciated you are liable for a tax on capital gains. If you donate this asset that simply eliminates the gain and the associated tax. But this is obviously a thing.
If you donate an asset it eliminates the gain and the associated tax in addition to giving you a tax deduction in the amount of the donation. This is why people like to donate highly appreciated assets rather than selling the asset and donating the resulting funds.
Re:Twitter's Dorsey auctions first ever tweet as digital mem...
by ceejayoz on Saturday March 06, 2021 @12:18PM
(#26368872)
The gain is fake. The tax benefit from the donation that is based on that fake gain is not.
It’s like making a million dollars in counterfeit money, then donating that to charity. You reduce taxes by $370,000, and are out $0.
Basically, a sketchy businessman buys a bunch of art from some random unknown artist for pennies. He then gets his art world friends to start praising that artist and thus appraise the art at a stupidly high value. Come tax season, sketchy business man turns philanthropist and donates said art to some random museum. That donation is written off as a tax credit at that stupidly high value and now some museum is left holding crappy art. Alternatives strategies involve using the over-valued art as collateral for a loan or something in case cash is needed instead.
It's sorta like a pump-and-dump, except the intent is to fool some bureaucracy rather than the public.