Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by kcartlidge on Friday March 05, 2021 @04:47PM
(#26362560)
I know the feeling. In my very meta case I get frustrated with my own SSGs, so every time I start learning a new language an SSG is one of my two standard projects to give a frame of comparison.
I now have my own SSGs written in C#, Go, Node, Python, Ruby, and PHP. It's totally ridiculous, I know. Yak shaving and shiny to the nth degree.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by mbreese on Friday March 05, 2021 @04:57PM
(#26362656)
That makes a lot of sense to me. It used to be that writing a blog engine was the "Hello World" of a new language or framework. So, it makes sense that a SSG would be a good non-trivial project to use to learn or understand the pros/cons of a language.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by ci5er on Monday March 08, 2021 @11:52AM
(#26387943)
I prefer ray-tracers (or other rendering or physics engines), maybe because I'm old or have nothing to blog about.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by hanklazard on Friday March 05, 2021 @07:01PM
(#26363889)
Sorry to pile on here, but THANKS for Hugo! It’s legitimately great and has helped me quickly and easily updated (with the help of netlify) set up a really useful set of online notes for myself. I truly appreciate your work.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by waterside81 on Friday March 05, 2021 @02:39PM
(#26361109)
Hey - thanks for making Hugo. We run our blog on it and I love it. Spitting out an AMP version and maintaing it side-by-side with our non-AMP version was a piece of cake.
Edit: noticed you make Cobra too! Damn - I owe you like 1000 man hours of saved work.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by regus on Friday March 05, 2021 @02:54PM
(#26361272)
spf13, thank you for your vim config, I have been using it for years!
In regards to Hugo, I enjoyed using it at first, I loved how fast it was, but I kept running into issues so I decided to make my own SSG.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by dtihanyi on Friday March 05, 2021 @08:39PM
(#26364438)
I absolutely love Hugo and as someone who was completely new to static site generators, it was the easiest to pick up and use in my opinion. Thanks!
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by baxtr on Friday March 05, 2021 @05:03PM
(#26362721)
Hey there, I’m a happy Jekyll user. What frustrated you about it?
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by epalm on Friday March 05, 2021 @07:01PM
(#26363885)
Jekyll lost me at “step one, install ruby”
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary
by 1f60c on Friday March 05, 2021 @09:28PM
(#26364685)
When Jekyll was created, all Apple laptops shipped with Ruby, and Apple has (had?) a large share of the “developer/power user” market. That’s my theory, at least.
Happy to see some Hugo ideas made it into Zola.