News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by spf13 on Friday March 05, 2021 @02:29PM (#26361006)
I did this exact thing when I got frustrated with Jekyll (and friends) and created Hugo. Of course, at the time all SSGs were in dynamic languages and very VERY slow.

Happy to see some Hugo ideas made it into Zola.

Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by kcartlidge on Friday March 05, 2021 @04:47PM (#26362560)
I know the feeling. In my very meta case I get frustrated with my own SSGs, so every time I start learning a new language an SSG is one of my two standard projects to give a frame of comparison.

I now have my own SSGs written in C#, Go, Node, Python, Ruby, and PHP. It's totally ridiculous, I know. Yak shaving and shiny to the nth degree.

Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by mbreese on Friday March 05, 2021 @04:57PM (#26362656)
That makes a lot of sense to me. It used to be that writing a blog engine was the "Hello World" of a new language or framework. So, it makes sense that a SSG would be a good non-trivial project to use to learn or understand the pros/cons of a language.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by ci5er on Monday March 08, 2021 @11:52AM (#26387943)
I prefer ray-tracers (or other rendering or physics engines), maybe because I'm old or have nothing to blog about.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by hanklazard on Friday March 05, 2021 @07:01PM (#26363889)
Sorry to pile on here, but THANKS for Hugo! It’s legitimately great and has helped me quickly and easily updated (with the help of netlify) set up a really useful set of online notes for myself. I truly appreciate your work.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by waterside81 on Friday March 05, 2021 @02:39PM (#26361109)
Hey - thanks for making Hugo. We run our blog on it and I love it. Spitting out an AMP version and maintaing it side-by-side with our non-AMP version was a piece of cake.

Edit: noticed you make Cobra too! Damn - I owe you like 1000 man hours of saved work.

Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by regus on Friday March 05, 2021 @02:54PM (#26361272)
spf13, thank you for your vim config, I have been using it for years!

In regards to Hugo, I enjoyed using it at first, I loved how fast it was, but I kept running into issues so I decided to make my own SSG.

Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by dtihanyi on Friday March 05, 2021 @08:39PM (#26364438)
I absolutely love Hugo and as someone who was completely new to static site generators, it was the easiest to pick up and use in my opinion. Thanks!
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by baxtr on Friday March 05, 2021 @05:03PM (#26362721)
Hey there, I’m a happy Jekyll user. What frustrated you about it?
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by epalm on Friday March 05, 2021 @07:01PM (#26363885)
Jekyll lost me at “step one, install ruby”
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by 1f60c on Friday March 05, 2021 @09:28PM (#26364685)
When Jekyll was created, all Apple laptops shipped with Ruby, and Apple has (had?) a large share of the “developer/power user” market. That’s my theory, at least.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by Dma54rhs on Saturday March 06, 2021 @07:17AM (#26366907)
Even shared hosting at the time came with ruby on rails support. Maybe it still does, but ruby was way more popular at the time in general.
Re:Zola: A fast static site generator in a single binary by ognarb on Friday March 05, 2021 @06:45PM (#26363756)
Thanks for making Hugo. Hugo is the only SSG I found with a good story regarding i18n.