baxtr

Feedback: I don’t understand how the rising category works. I looked up a couple of books and they seemed to have peaked a while ago.

I am talking about what they actually do after they got elected.

I understand that it’s way easier and quicker to do the latter instead of saving.

That’s the reason they do it in the first place.

I just wonder if there is a way to incentivize them to save instead. Maybe some country was successful at one point in time.

So, you can always say: Look, it’s not us (especially not my org!). It f’ing Microsoft/AWS. Everyone got hacked.

You and your career are gonna be fine.

AFAIK declining mental health was the main driver of the bans - put forward by its proponents like Jonathan Haidt, author of "The Anxious Generation."

"How much is needed during no sun and no wind" could be reasonable comparison.

https://claude.dev/blog/solving-code-review-at-anthropic/

Any good scientific theory must create falsifiable hypotheses.

Otherwise it’s just a nice story.

As opposed to creating flows where LLMs do something on the fly.

Code creates determinism, LLMs don’t.

It’s easy to insinuate that people aren’t making an effort. But maybe it’s says more about the person on the receiving end than the person "who is not making the effort".

- we don’t understand how LLMs work

- DeepSeek is funded through an state-backed investment fund

- China and the US are sort of adversaries

Isn’t that enough to be cautious at the very least?

To that end I’ve read all your comments. I am not sure what you’re proposing or asking people to do?

Are you asking for empathy? I have a lot of respect and empathy for people who dedicated their life to solving complex problems.

At the same time I’m trying to be optimistic by saying not all is lost. Yes people will need to adjust. I’m arguing continual change and adaption have always been part of life.