Re:Honda's now selling the first production car with level 3...
by Aeolun on Friday March 05, 2021 @09:02AM
(#26356930)
From what I remember, Elaine was mostly killed because she stepped in front of a moving car in the middle of the night.
I’m not convinced that’s the best example, since the AI might have actually done better if it had full control of the car instead of defaulting to ‘please take over now’ mode.
Re:Honda's now selling the first production car with level 3...
by jeffreygoesto on Friday March 05, 2021 @12:24PM
(#26359351)
Right. I could have stated it better, what I meant was that the (safety) driver was not paying (enough) attention to the road and was basically driving Level 3 (the car drives and it will beep whenever I need to take over, so just relax and browse the web). It was impossible to react to the short notice and the warning was _not_ given 10 seconds ago. I personally think the system had sensed her as a succession of standing targets and never predicted any velocity vector. Braking for static radar targets is not happening, because of the clutter you get everywhere you would not drive at all. So the misclassification and misprediction was not detectable for the system (in it's world model, everything looked consistent) and it warned too late.
Re:Honda's now selling the first production car with level 3...
by mbreese on Friday March 05, 2021 @10:22AM
(#26357783)
If I remember correctly, the cars built in system for emergency braking in this scenario was disabled. So, any other car of that type would have avoided the accident. However, because the AI apparently knew better, it was disabled and someone died.
AI has the problem that not only does it need to observe the environment and determine what to do, but it has to predict the actions of non-rational actor (humans). We aren’t always predictable. AI isn’t always predictable either. The woman who died may have assumed that a car driven by a person would have stopped.
[0] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326568066_Towards_a...