News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by whalesalad on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @03:33PM (#26334022)
The B-2 is ancient, doesn't seem very surprising.
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by Voloskaya on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @04:05PM (#26334527)
It is by no mean ancient.

The introduction of the B-2 in service was ~24 years ago, this is one of the most recent jet in the US air force. By military standard it's definitely young.

There are only 2 planes in service in the US more recent than that, the F-22 and F-35 (not counting transport aircrafts).

Those planes are designed for lifespans of 50-100 years.

Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by whalesalad on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @04:13PM (#26334631)
My dad was at the Skunk Works for 20 years. He then went on to work at Northrop for a good chunk of time as well.

The B-2 was started in the 70s and the maiden flight occurred while I was still baking in the womb.

I realize aircraft can live a long time and can be retrofitted and upgraded with modern technology - but all things considered it is old.

Not saying ancient is bad, either, but as far as organizations go, org knowledge, handoffs of info and books and writing etc... I am not surprised to see the need for reverse engineering.

Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by Jtsummers on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @03:41PM (#26334146)
I had to check, it's not as ancient as some other bombers with B-2 first flight occurring in 1989. I met a pilot who flew on the same B-52 as his father, and his grandfather had flown some of the first B-52s. This was in the 00s, about 15-18 years ago.
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by aphextron on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @03:58PM (#26334422)
It's impossible to overstate how long these things have been in service. The oldest B-52 airframes still in active service were built longer ago than the first flight of the Wright brothers was when they were built.
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by rstupek on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @04:35PM (#26334938)
And likely to be in service for another 30 years. A 100 year airframe
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by koalahedron on Thursday March 04, 2021 @01:28PM (#26346150)
I worked at Boeing Wichita (which is no more), and an engineer told me that the B-52 was getting heavier over time because the old wires weren't removed for avionics upgrades. Of course, they were always trying to put one over on me as a newbie (I worked on avionics S/W in Ada for the tankers).

He also said a big problem was the expense of doing a modern engine upgrade. Anyone know if they ever re-engined it? Was he joking again?

Having one of these fly over my apartment on Rock Rd. was a dish rattler--I used to see B-2s every once in a while too (fairly loud too, IIRC).

Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by koalahedron on Thursday March 04, 2021 @10:57PM (#26352479)
20 years later, looks like they are taking RFPs for re-engining:

[PDF] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11413

I guess he was right about the engines.

Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by Daho0n on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @04:42PM (#26335044)
It first flew 31 years ago. If that is ancient what is the F-16 that first flew 49 years ago?