News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by aphextron on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @03:58PM (#26334422)
It's impossible to overstate how long these things have been in service. The oldest B-52 airframes still in active service were built longer ago than the first flight of the Wright brothers was when they were built.
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by rstupek on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @04:35PM (#26334938)
And likely to be in service for another 30 years. A 100 year airframe
Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by koalahedron on Thursday March 04, 2021 @01:28PM (#26346150)
I worked at Boeing Wichita (which is no more), and an engineer told me that the B-52 was getting heavier over time because the old wires weren't removed for avionics upgrades. Of course, they were always trying to put one over on me as a newbie (I worked on avionics S/W in Ada for the tankers).

He also said a big problem was the expense of doing a modern engine upgrade. Anyone know if they ever re-engined it? Was he joking again?

Having one of these fly over my apartment on Rock Rd. was a dish rattler--I used to see B-2s every once in a while too (fairly loud too, IIRC).

Re:The Air Force is having to reverse engineer parts of its ... by koalahedron on Thursday March 04, 2021 @10:57PM (#26352479)
20 years later, looks like they are taking RFPs for re-engining:

[PDF] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11413

I guess he was right about the engines.