News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by rowanG077 on Sunday February 28, 2021 @06:12PM (#26297999)
Ah yes! The experimental toy languages without specification like Python.
Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by kiwidrew on Sunday February 28, 2021 @07:23PM (#26298430)
CPython is the only viable Python interpreter, and the Python language specification is "whatever CPython does". In my humble opinion this disqualifies Python from consideration as a language.

That doesn't mean Python isn't useful! It is in fact a wildly successful tool that has spawned a large ecosystem of packages and a diverse group of users. But it unfortunately does not qualify as a true language, for it lacks the necessary ingredients: a formal specification of the language and more than one implementation of said specification.

Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by fao_ on Sunday February 28, 2021 @06:17PM (#26298042)
I'm sorry, what are PEPs, again?
Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by rowanG077 on Sunday February 28, 2021 @06:51PM (#26298264)
PEPs are specification fragments. But it's far from a complete python language specification.