That doesn't seem to relate to what I said.

Obama making decisions on his own doesn't have anything to do with middle east nation's interest in US approval for their own actions.

Killing people in other countries because their government isn't doing enough to fight extremism doesn't sound like they've been "left to their own devices".

"left to their own devices" doesn't mean that the US (or anyone else) would be uninvolved in things.

I'm addressing what those middle east nations choose to do and who they consult with, get 'approval' from / etc.

> "left to their own devices" doesn't mean that the US (or anyone else) would be uninvolved in things.

What? That's exactly what it means.

and less than a hundred days into his Presidency Biden is bombing the Middle East; a guy who claimed he would use military power responsibly and his supporters mocked Trump supporters that claimed otherwise.

The simple fact is we have very little justification to criticize the actions of other nations when we cannot even go an Administration without attacking another nation.

1) what makes the bombing a non-responsible use of military power?

2) Why is the US not allowed to "attack[] another nation"? esp given it was a response to attacks on American/coalition personnel?