Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by sizzle on Thursday February 25, 2021 @01:18PM
(#26266116)
You could talk to your users... (i.e. UX research), observe them using your website or product and ask them non leading probing questions to see what the intent is behind the behaviors affecting your bottom line. Qualitative research methods are a rich source of insight that is typically underinvested and underutilized.
Analytics (quantitative data) can help you find areas of bottlenecks to explore further by doing qualitative user research and getting to the ‘why’ behind the people problems standing in the way of your metrics you are tracking (retention, adoption, etc.). This is called ‘triangulation’ using quant and qual research methods to understand your users more deeply than just looking at data can achieve.
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by google234123 on Thursday February 25, 2021 @01:30PM
(#26266287)
Users hate being bothered and hate taking surveys. Qualitative research isn't scientific anyway.
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by warent on Thursday February 25, 2021 @02:06PM
(#26266776)
Well this is just untrue in my experience. I run a SaaS business and my customers love it when you ask for their opinions and insight.
Where are you getting your information from?
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by haram_masala on Thursday February 25, 2021 @02:57PM
(#26267445)
This is a very important point, thanks for saying this. It’s amazing how many people think they can start an indie SaaS and think that all they have to do is build it, deploy it, and buy AdWords or whatever. Talking to your customers is more important than any of that, and it’s fun.
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by atq2119 on Thursday February 25, 2021 @02:51PM
(#26267366)
Perhaps you're only hearing back from the ones who love it?
Related, survey respondents are known to be weird.
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by mattnewton on Thursday February 25, 2021 @01:53PM
(#26266592)
UX research participants are usually compensated, and so it's usually done to drill down deeper into problems that analytics found and test possible explainations. I don't see what's unscientific about that.
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by worik on Thursday February 25, 2021 @10:26PM
(#26271085)
> Qualitative research isn't scientific anyway
Science is not the only form of truth.
Re:Google Analytics: Stop feeding the beast
by prox on Thursday February 25, 2021 @12:25PM
(#26265339)
Could be that, it could be design, it could be how something is worded, it could be that what you want the client to see, isn’t being seen. Analytics helps to identify this problem. For instance I noticed recently a huge drop-off in visitors from Ipads, and a redesign apparently made some parts of the site dysfunctional for some ipad users, something we didn’t catch earlier.
How do you find out if your "useful" feature isn't as useful as you thought it was? Or is it really always "the user can't find it"?