Re:Perseverance Rover lands on Mars [video]
by Nekhrimah on Thursday February 18, 2021 @07:46PM
(#26188009)
> Here's a breakdown: https://youtu.be/4TxkE_oYrjU
I watched the first 90 seconds of this. On the cost of re-usability of a falcon 9 point, the figures are shown as from Wikipedia.
So 1) not a primary source. 2) fails to calculate the percentage correctly between $62m and $50m as "around 10%". It's almost 20% on those figures. 3) and most importantly, those numbers are the cost to the customer, not SpaceX's internal cost. As they have no current competition in rocket re-usability, they are able to recoup the R&D cost for developing this technology.
I don't think I'll bother watching the rest of the video.
Re:Perseverance Rover lands on Mars [video]
by m4rtink on Thursday February 18, 2021 @09:56PM
(#26189054)
Yeah, they are certainly not launching so many Starlinks at the same price they charge to the customers. A very big benefit having your own partially reusable rocket (especially as long as no one other has one yet).
Re:Perseverance Rover lands on Mars [video]
by tristanb on Thursday February 18, 2021 @06:26PM
(#26187286)
you're wrong. That video is a bunch of crud
Re:Perseverance Rover lands on Mars [video]
by Daho0n on Thursday February 18, 2021 @07:07PM
(#26187674)
And I'm sure you believe that US and foreign competitors of SpaceX who says the same thing are just spewing PR, right? It was a random video. The message is not wrong. Being snippy doesn't change facts.
Re:Perseverance Rover lands on Mars [video]
by shazmosushi on Friday February 19, 2021 @07:13PM
(#26199833)
The Thunderf00t video is wrong, see my video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36o4UrS9OS4
Here's a breakdown: https://youtu.be/4TxkE_oYrjU