Re:Migrating to SQLAlchemy 2.0
by zzzeek on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:47PM
(#26186905)
no worries, I'm pretty known for being reactive to comments of all kinds, it's both a feature and a bug. SQLAlchemy was never meant to be as "simple" as django but I just dont want people to be scared off of it; that said, I'm super glad everyone who uses django sticks with django because they would be very grumpy SQLAlchemy users. the idea is supposed to be, make a larger investment upfront, get a bigger payoff. it's a tough balloon to float which is why I'm always nosing around people's twitter threads.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Migrating to SQLAlchemy 2.0
by mixmastamyk on Friday February 19, 2021 @03:19AM
(#26190803)
If you've got the best design in the long run there's nothing to worry about. That said, it takes a while to find it! And the target is always moving.
2.0 definitely looks like a step in the right direction. Can't wait to use it with psycopg3 and the latest Python. Thanks. ;-)