News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by Beached on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:31PM (#26095710)
doesn't samsung have the capability to create its own fab hardware? if they are the supplier to themselves, wouldn't it be reasonable that they can prioritize delivering to themsleves
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by avs733 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:37PM (#26095777)
not that I am aware of (read: no unless someone proves me dumb)

Major supppliers include:

Nikon

ASML

KLA-Tencor

Applied Materials (AMAT)

Lam Research

the timeline they are suggesting isn't literally impossible as a matter of phyics but is, to me, laughably unrealistic and likely done to try and extract tax incentives.

Unless they have already broken ground in Texas...and are just shopping for a better deal

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by baybal2 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:47PM (#26095865)
> Major supppliers include:

Add like 100 more companies to the list.

A fab is not only a lithographic line, but a ton of other very unique, industry specific equipment.

Air handling for fabs stuff is up to 24 months lead time, and has no use in any other industry.

Ultra clean water plants — 9 to 18 months. Just two vendors on the planet.

Gas plants — take few years to construct by themselves

Chem plants — again years long lead time equipment from only one vendor in the world

On site mask shops — equipment, and processes not much cheaper, or less scarce than the last gen chip making gear itself.

Cleaning stations, degassing stations, industry specific SCADA hardware, AMHS... (https://youtu.be/XKXZT-BBUEE)

Post-backend stuff...

The list will go on for a few screens.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by avs733 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @09:07PM (#26097419)
I’m honestly surprised we have not seen a blank wafer shortage. I remember the craziness post 2011 earthquake...”well how many wafers do we have”
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by nl on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @09:30PM (#26097554)
There is a blank wafer shortage, but - strangely - for 200mm wafers (not the state-of-the-art 300mm ones)

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/318554-a-massive-chip-...

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by avs733 on Thursday February 11, 2021 @10:41AM (#26102708)
I wouldn't even have thought to look at 200mm for a shortage. That is an (in hindsight) obvious corner of death for these processes/products I wouldn't even have thought of.
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by totalZero on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @09:47PM (#26097674)
Interesting. Tells us something about the maturity of the products seeing unanticipated demand.
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by mhh__ on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:00PM (#26096507)
Even a Pencil (I, Pencil) takes thousands and thousands of people, I'm guessing it's on the order of millions for a big fab.
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by kuschku on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @05:33PM (#26095722)
ASML is the only supplier for EUV machines. Samsung can’t just create those easily themselves (or they would).
Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by Robotbeat on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @06:20PM (#26096207)
Is there any reason they couldn’t just start with multipatterning 193nm immersion? Maybe even ship that equipment out from a facility being upgraded.

Also, ASML’s EUV light source division was fairly recently (2013) acquired from... California. Cymer, LLC.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by kokx on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:00PM (#26096500)
The type of equipment ASML produces generally gets brought in at a specific time during the construction. They kinda build the cleanrooms around ASML's machines instead of bringing them in afterwards.

Retooling for EUV (or any new generation of such equipment) is very hard. Most (if not all) foundries build new factories rather than retooling old ones.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by totalZero on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @09:43PM (#26097649)
> They kinda build the cleanrooms around ASML's machines instead of bringing them in afterwards.

I know they're massive, but do you have a source for this? I was under the impression that construction and tool installation are two distinctly separate phases of construction due to the requirements for an immaculate environment. Also, my understanding is that companies like to bring the tools in as late as possible to shorten the delay between capex outlay (tools are expensive) and first production.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by kokx on Thursday February 11, 2021 @08:51AM (#26101475)
My source for this is my professors at the TU/e in Eindhoven and guest lecturers from ASML (TU/e is the closest university to the ASML campus in Veldhoven).

Unfortunately I don't have a more reliable source on that though.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by baybal2 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:28PM (#26096730)
> Is there any reason they couldn’t just start with multipatterning 193nm immersion?

Time, yields, line size.

Quadruple patterning quadrupples the lithography steps counts. And quadrupples thermal cycles. Which adds more than 4x impact on the number of bad wafers.

100% - 2% * 4 != 100% * 0.98⁴

You need 4x the equipment to complete the same volume of wafers in the same time, which means 4x the line length.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by baybal2 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @06:25PM (#26096251)
Retooling of anymuch modern fabs is not economical.

I don't see much retooling for anything below 45nm, if not 65nm.

Re:Samsung Foundry: New $17B Fab in the USA by Late 2023 by adriancr on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:14PM (#26096627)
multipatterning DUV will get you up to a point if thats what you were asking. You cant reach 5nm with that. (if that were possible you wouldnt see everyone jumping on ASMLs euv bandwagon)

As for lightsource, sure, that was/is a US company, but there's a lot more to a machine then just the light source.