Re:Launch HN: SigNoz (YC W21) – Open-source alternative to D...
by spech on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @03:32PM
(#26082088)
+1 for Grafana together with Loki and Prometheus. This saved us so much trouble. We thought about using DD first but the costs were so intransparent.
Re:Launch HN: SigNoz (YC W21) – Open-source alternative to D...
by wdb on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @07:50PM
(#26084551)
Grafana Tempo for the traces looks interesting too! Especially now that it doesn't require Elastic anymore
Re:Launch HN: SigNoz (YC W21) – Open-source alternative to D...
by pranay01 on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @03:43PM
(#26082172)
Curious, do you use self-host Prom+Loki?
Re:Launch HN: SigNoz (YC W21) – Open-source alternative to D...
by technics256 on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @04:57PM
(#26082897)
I do it with my clients, but we're not using a lot of clusters.
Re:Launch HN: SigNoz (YC W21) – Open-source alternative to D...
by ankitnayan on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @03:33PM
(#26082093)
Grafana, for long, has been used to monitor time-series data and recently has been moving towards observability (including traces and logs). We are different in quite a few fronts.
1. There are specific observabilty specific UI widgets like serviceMap, SLOs and error budgets, I don't know whether Grafana provides it now. Also, last I used Grafana, linking and moving from one dashboard to another is still a pain. You can get a better idea of how different observability UI can get from Grafana by looking into LightStep demo.
2. We can run aggregated on filtered traces. Eg, I can get 99th percentile response time of a tag say payment_channel. am afraid this can be extracted from traces by Grafana.
3. SigNoz is easily extendible by adding your stream processing application to slice n dice data in your own way
Ummm... https://grafana.com/products/cloud/features/