Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis...
by rmrfrmrf on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:15AM
(#26026697)
Not even close to a comparable analogy. A better analogy would be yours, but where the ink disappears after 1 day and the person getting the tattoo dies a day later.
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis...
by asjldkfin on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:18AM
(#26026722)
No, it’s a perfect analogy, because it illustrates that efficacy is independent of moral perspective.
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis...
by rmrfrmrf on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:21AM
(#26026748)
Morality has nothing to do with it. If consulting advice literally bankrupts your company, the advice is trash, full stop.
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis...
by asjldkfin on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:35AM
(#26026928)
No, the advice Purdue asked for bankrupted the company.
Just like how asking a programmer to build a garbage program doesn’t mean the programmer is trash, it just means the specs are.
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis...
by carapace on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:57AM
(#26027194)
Programmers who build garbage are part of the problem, no?
If you go to a Tattoo artist and ask for a portrait tattooed on your face, it might be gauche as hell, but that didn’t change the fact the artist might’ve done a great job.