News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis role: source. Parent comment

Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis... by asjldkfin on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:18AM (#26026722)
No, it’s a perfect analogy, because it illustrates that efficacy is independent of moral perspective.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis... by rmrfrmrf on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:21AM (#26026748)
Morality has nothing to do with it. If consulting advice literally bankrupts your company, the advice is trash, full stop.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis... by asjldkfin on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:35AM (#26026928)
No, the advice Purdue asked for bankrupted the company.

Just like how asking a programmer to build a garbage program doesn’t mean the programmer is trash, it just means the specs are.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis... by carapace on Thursday February 04, 2021 @11:57AM (#26027194)
Programmers who build garbage are part of the problem, no?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis... by asjldkfin on Thursday February 04, 2021 @12:13PM (#26027400)
Not if they build garbage well, the quality of the code and the quality of the product are independent.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:McKinsey to pay $573M to settle claims over opioid crisis... by carapace on Thursday February 04, 2021 @04:56PM (#26030254)
But isn't building garbage a problem? What's the point of automatic garbage?
[ Parent | on HN ]