News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by JMTQp8lwXL on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:10PM (#26021378)
Doesn't the rollout of IPv6 largely replace the cookie as a useful identifier of sorts?
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by dwaite on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:32PM (#26021527)
IPv6 may make fingerprinting harder since you might lose a single static identifier for users. Of course, you could gain a unique identifier per device on a subnet without security measures there.

However, it doesn't affect cookies which are bound to origin names rather than addresses.

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by justinclift on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:29PM (#26021514)
That's a good point. Static IPv6 addresses or even a (small) pool of them could make for a reliable ID.

Wonder how people should work around that?

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by pferde on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:34PM (#26021544)
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by gcblkjaidfj on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:14PM (#26021399)
Not really. ipv6 has nothing to do with any of this.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by SulfurHexaFluri on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:28PM (#26021501)
Yes it does. Users now have a unique IP address that is now static. Yes you can rotate your exact IP inside your block but you still keep the same subnet.
Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by gcblkjaidfj on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:53PM (#26021655)
That is the promise they sold it on.

But, point me to a single ISP that gives a cable subscriber more than one IPv6 address. or a /48 as initially everyone was hopping.

ISP profit from NAT. They will never get rid of it. Even if you get a /54 /64 the ad networks will just learn to assign /54 as they do today.

But, another point, ipv4 today is barred from being used to form your advertising profile under current legislation.

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by ArchOversight on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @09:11PM (#26021754)
Comcast gives you a /60 block that you can assign multiple /64's out of.

My computer rotates out IPv6 addresses every 30 minutes using SLAAC with privacy addresses.

While you can identify the /64, there is no guarantee that it is a single user, just like in IPv4 because of NAT there is no guarantee it is a single user. It'll identity a household, but that's it.

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by gcblkjaidfj on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @06:04PM (#26083700)
> just like in IPv4

is the key concept I am talking about here and everyone keep saying it is not.

Just like ipv4 is what matter and why ISP will never kill NAT. They profit from it, somehow. and it is not just saving money on ipv4 address space.

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by seanhunter on Thursday February 04, 2021 @08:23AM (#26025091)
My ISP (Andrews and Arnold) does exactly this.

https://support.aa.net.uk/IPv6

"Customers are allocated a /48 block of addresses - this is usually per customer, and so a customer with multiple circuits or sites will have a /64 allocated from the larger /48 block"

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by kenada on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @10:50PM (#26022375)
Spectrum assigns a /128 to your router via DHCPv6, but you also get a delegated prefix. That prefix seems to be a /64 by default, but you can request and receive a /56.