News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by wmf on Monday July 28, 2008 @07:12PM (#259792)
If you allow people to vote after they have seen the rankings, you have the wisdom of mobs. The only way to get the wisdom of crowds is to ask people before they have seen other people's opinions.
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by Hexstream on Monday July 28, 2008 @08:05PM (#259831)
I upmodded your post because it already had +9!
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by cstejerean on Monday July 28, 2008 @09:29PM (#259895)
I wonder what would happen on this site if the comments and stories were still sorted by points but the actual number was hidden (or perhaps only hidden until after you vote but I don't see why they need to be there period).
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by a-priori on Monday July 28, 2008 @11:17PM (#259980)
That would completely change how I vote. I vote by comparing a post's score to the amount I would give it if I could pick a value. If they're significantly different, I vote accordingly.
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by staunch on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @12:34AM (#260068)
If you're really curious checkout Perlmonks.org. It's been around for a decade and has consistently maintained a community that more closely resembles this site than any other I've seen. Blind voting has been in use there for a very long time and has worked quite well. You're also alloted a limited number of points per day based on your karma (XP) level.
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by chandler on Monday July 28, 2008 @10:19PM (#259929)
>> (or perhaps only hidden until after you vote but I don't see why they need to be there period)

That's an interesting point--why does every site need to quantify for the user the particular score of a comment? Why not indicate popularity by simply ordering the comments?

Is it a trust issue?

Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by wmf on Monday July 28, 2008 @10:37PM (#259944)
Karma -> karma whoring -> pageviews -> profit?

Slashdot no longer displays numeric karma and you can disable display of comment scores.

Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by eru on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @07:40AM (#260349)
You could also give other clues besides ordering - without revealing the numbers 'in your face'.
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by william42 on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @11:49AM (#260647)
What sort of other clues?
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by eru on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @04:37PM (#261051)
For example color-shading. While it may still be possible to re-extract numbers from the colors --- psychological colors may have another effect than numbers.
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by eru on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @04:39PM (#261054)
Or perhaps something like Nethack does: http://www.steelypips.org/nethack/pray.html#p0
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by william42 on Wednesday July 30, 2008 @09:49PM (#262552)
That's sort of like what Slashdot does for karma. "Karma: Excellent"
Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by noonespecial on Tuesday July 29, 2008 @10:35AM (#260522)
It seems like in this case we have a temporal error. A popular movie generated buzz now and skewed a result that people pronounce loosely as of all time.

Batman might be the best movie out recently but in 2 years time, it will be a dim and fading memory while the Godfather will retain its appeal as it has already proven that it can.

IMDB just needs a temporal filter to keep the latest trend from skewing the universal result.

Re:When the 'Wisdom of Crowds' turns on itself: IMDB Edition by breck on Monday July 28, 2008 @08:03PM (#259829)
But it only takes 1 spoiler to publicize the results to ruin it for most everyone else.