News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CDC website built by Deloitte at a cost of $44M is abando... by adrianN on Saturday January 30, 2021 @11:45PM (#25976041)
Plain old HTML is responsive. It stops being responsive when you start trying to make it look good.
Re:CDC website built by Deloitte at a cost of $44M is abando... by canofbars on Sunday January 31, 2021 @12:11AM (#25976201)
Plain old HTML stops being responsive as soon as you try to do anything more than text. A plain HTML table would be horrible on mobile. If you want to reflow anything that isn't text you will need flexbox. There is literally no reason to not use CSS to make a site that works well on mobile and desktop.
Re:CDC website built by Deloitte at a cost of $44M is abando... by afavour on Saturday January 30, 2021 @11:59PM (#25976130)
I’m not convinced that’s true. Case in point: tabular data. I don’t think presenting something in a table is an attempt to make it look good, I think it’s the most logical and recognisable way of presenting certain kinds of information. But tables don’t scale well on a mobile viewport without extra work.
Re:CDC website built by Deloitte at a cost of $44M is abando... by Aeolun on Sunday January 31, 2021 @08:00AM (#25978475)
Reasonable tables work fine on a mobile viewport. It’s when you get into crazy ones that it breaks down.