News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ProtonMail, Tutanota urging EU to reconsider encryption r... by Aeolun on Thursday January 28, 2021 @07:49AM (#25941131)
Yeah, and that part is the pipe dream. You really need to compromise it only once to have access to everything.

It’s unreasonable to believe only the government will have access.

Re:ProtonMail, Tutanota urging EU to reconsider encryption r... by amelius on Thursday January 28, 2021 @08:06AM (#25941257)
You implement it by putting the key inside a box, and letting that box perform the decryption. No other services/ports allowed. (Except you have to have a way to get the public key out, and allow the box to generate a private key which means it needs entropy). You can pot the box in epoxy for additional security.
Re:ProtonMail, Tutanota urging EU to reconsider encryption r... by tehwebguy on Thursday January 28, 2021 @08:16AM (#25941336)
Nothing that you, tzs and vbezhenar are describing is different from “end to end encryption, but with a backdoor that could be leaked”
Re:ProtonMail, Tutanota urging EU to reconsider encryption r... by Aeolun on Friday January 29, 2021 @06:00AM (#25956096)
So now you have an ultra secure box. It’s like the unsinkable Titanic. Someone (somehow) copies the key, and proceeds to decrypt all your citizens’ communications, but you are 100% that hasn’t happened, because it is, after all, impossible.

Just like it was impossible for the Titanic to sink.

Re:ProtonMail, Tutanota urging EU to reconsider encryption r... by mnw21cam on Thursday January 28, 2021 @09:21AM (#25942086)
Just to add another thing in: Which government?
Re:ProtonMail, Tutanota urging EU to reconsider encryption r... by vbezhenar on Friday January 29, 2021 @07:30AM (#25956564)
Obviously one which can force companies to implement whatever they want. Currently it's US, EU, probably China.