Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust?

Re:Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust? by jorangreef on Saturday January 16, 2021 @06:05AM (#25801516)

I believe the rationale against operator overloading is not a question of whether the programmer should or shouldn't be trusted, but rather simply about optimizing for code readability.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust? by pjmlp on Monday January 18, 2021 @05:55AM (#25820439)

Then better integrate some static analysis with natural grammar knowledge to ensure all functions are properly named for their actual purpose.

[ Parent | on HN ]