News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust?. Parent comment

Re:Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust? by Dylan16807 on Friday January 15, 2021 @09:10PM (#25799269)
> the function calls make it crystal clear that something non-trivial is happening under the hood

Alright well I'd also rather write "vec1 [*] (vec2 [+] vec3)" too. Or equivalent.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust? by hansvm on Friday January 15, 2021 @10:20PM (#25799716)
Zig is still in development, and they're not necessarily opposed to an idea like that. I agree that could be a nice addition.

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/427

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Zig when there is already C++, D, and Rust? by higerordermap on Friday January 15, 2021 @10:42PM (#25799827)
This is a nice idea
[ Parent | on HN ]