Re:Intel’s 8-Core Mobile Tiger Lake-H, at 45 W, to Ship in Q1
by agloeregrets on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @10:37AM
(#25748224)
> 2. Apple M1, though the Intel 10875H is pretty much the same perf (though at 3x the power usage)
In single core? At least by Geekbench (clearly not the best test) it is shown to be more than 25% slower than M1.
Re:Intel’s 8-Core Mobile Tiger Lake-H, at 45 W, to Ship in Q1
by kllrnohj on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @12:11PM
(#25749868)
Assuming Intel is sticking to Specint2017 for that claim, the M1's lead isn't that big: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16252/mac-mini-apple-m1-teste...
So per that the M1 is 8% faster in single-core than the 28W i7-1185G7 (side note: Intel fix your naming yeesh). It would not at all be surprising if Intel claws that back, that's well within "typical" generational IPC gains.
Re:Intel’s 8-Core Mobile Tiger Lake-H, at 45 W, to Ship in Q1
by eulers_secret on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @11:52AM
(#25749555)
Doesn’t hyperthreding gain about 25% extra perf per core?
Is geekbech single core test a single thread test or two threads pinned to one core (if the cpu supports HT)?
1. AMD Ryzen 4900H
2. Apple M1, though the Intel 10875H is pretty much the same perf (though at 3x the power usage)
3. Only Intel uses this, so whatever Intel's fastest chip on this process is.
That said, it varies by use cases, and M1 leans heavily on accelerators so has big wins in some and big losses in others when compared the 4900H or 10875H, which are closer to each other in single threaded benchmarks.