That's because DonHopkins is shitposting quotes from the Unix Haters Handbook, which came out in 1994 and contains gripes about Unix dating back to the 80s.
The Unix ecosystem, including X11, evolved a teensy tiny bit since then.
Do you know any computer/user interface that is based on writing what you want to do? (instead of selecting it from a small list of possibilities) The only one that I know is the "primitive" command line.
Yet, is it possible to use siri or alexa for all your computing needs? Can you copy files around, convert a few images from tiff to jpg, download, compile and set up a nginx web server, hack a bit the code of the server and recompile, etc.? Because I can do all of that from the comfort of my "obsolete" command line.
I use my terminal and shell all day. :P
Hopefully we're getting there though!
No need for more modern examples.
Every piece of software (Excel? Word? Outlook? Autocad? Photoshop?) has its own system of automation if it has one at all, with many of the skills complicated to learn on one hand, and not transferable on the other. On tablets, automation is essentially nonexistent.
Whereas on Unix, there's a mostly-unified system of automation (shell), with mostly transferable knowledge.
If there is nothing in your work that benefits from automation, you wouldn't care. But you'd also be rather special, IME - most people spend a lot of time on recurring and automatable actions they gain no benefit from repeating manually.
Those are useful and beautiful, but they are particular cases of "command lines", aren't they? A bit limited, in that they are only useful for developing on that IDE, and not as a general interface for your computer, but useful command lines nonetheless. I thought you were opposed to command lines.
Xorg is stable and proven for decades; Wayland has been incomplete and buggy for decades.
I don't run Wayland, PulseAudio, DBUS, or SystemDumpsterFire on my system, and don't miss any of them.
I don't run strange binary code on my system either, so keyloggers aren't really a concern.
I find it ironic that people who routinely shovel foreign binary code onto their system (even automatically downloading and installing it, no less) from untrusted and untrustworthy third parties, are so all-fired concerned about these trifling imagined Xorg security problems.
I'm not going to ban you because you've mostly been posting good comments lately, which is cool. But comments like this do more damage than good comments add value, so please don't do that anymore.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, we'd be grateful.
- https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Please, let's not reduce the level of discussion over here. Let's keep this respectful.
I have deliberately chosen to keep my answer to the OP on point, even though I disagree just as strongly.
I've been using Xorg in one form or another since 2005-2006 and frankly since we all got automatic configuration and said godbye to Xorg.conf it's been a very very pleasant experience.
I've been using both nVidia and intel cards, 1/2/3 monitors (in various arrangement) and network stuff (ssh -X and similar), and a videogame from time to time.
Even xterm, with the right fonts, it's a very nice setup. I almost can't see the difference between a gtk emacs window and an emacs session running in xterm-unicode with proper fonts and antialiasing.
Xorg might not be "optimal", but it works very well for me and I won't be switching to anything else until a wayland or whatever reach feature parity (including but not limited to network transparency).
Whatever,