News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by type0 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @07:36AM (#25714096)
Last time I looked it was half baked and not easy to use, has it changed in recent years or months and can it be considered practical in a way that let's say Matrix is?
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by cel on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:48AM (#25715074)
Some updates:

Oasis is a new frontend (alternative to the Patchwork desktop app): https://github.com/fraction/oasis/

Manyverse continues development, including working on low-level database improvements, and gossip "rooms": https://www.manyver.se/blog/2021-01-update

Planetary (iOS app) approaches public launch: https://planetary.social/ https://viewer.scuttlebot.io/%25kXEXGmyNyo%2BuKkcySMwghVKpvR...

Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by neuland on Sunday January 10, 2021 @08:25PM (#25722982)
I don't see how these apps dont eventually get taken down like the Fediverse apps earlier this year. Eventually (probably once it's polished enough to be usable) the deplatformed communities will discover SSB and then Google/Apple will take the apps down.
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by olah_1 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @11:00AM (#25715957)
Manyverse’s work on room servers version 2 will be huge.

The rooms will function a lot more like real life buildings. Some will be private like homes, some will be public like libraries, others will be restricted like a club.

Really cool development!

Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by jamil7 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @08:46AM (#25714577)
It also spun up my laptops fans for minutes when syncing, I don’t know if thats still an issue. Cool project though and there are some interesting people involved and contributing.
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by hjacobs on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:55AM (#25715142)
Yes, the initial syncing and indexing can take a moment. I would recommend joining a single Pub or SSB room [1] to find people and grow your network organically. The large Pubs [2] have a lot of content to download and also follow bots (which you would have to block).

[1] https://github.com/staltz/ssb-room/blob/master/FAQ.md [2] https://github.com/ssbc/ssb-server/wiki/Pub-Servers

Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by pluc on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:55AM (#25715137)
That's like running a blockchain on your laptop - it first has to get the entire (in some cases, relevant) history so that it can act as a peer.
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by crossroadsguy on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:57AM (#25715166)
Every time I try it, it reminds me of Matrix. So near, yet so far.
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by newscracker on Sunday January 10, 2021 @08:08AM (#25714325)
I have similar questions too. It seemed as if it was tied to a single device and transferring information from one to another also seemed cumbersome.
Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by hobofan on Sunday January 10, 2021 @08:47AM (#25714581)
Yes[0]. AFAIK fully transferring an identity from one device to the next should not be a problem. The problem is more that updating the feed from multiple devices would create diverging feeds.

[0]: https://github.com/ssbc/handbook.scuttlebutt.nz/blob/master/...

Re:Scuttlebutt – A decentralized secure gossip platform by grey_earthling on Sunday January 10, 2021 @10:57AM (#25715917)
It's common for one person to have multiple feeds/identities, so this is less of a problem than you might expect.

There's no structured way to indicate that 2 feeds are the same person (aka #sameAs), but you can easily link to the other feed and just say “this is also me” (because your audience is a bunch of humans that mostly pass the Turing test).

Because of this, we get the bonus feature that you can easily follow a different set of feeds on different devices — e.g. perhaps on your phone you want feeds you're less likely to reply to, because you prefer typing on a physical keyboard.