News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by chr1 on Saturday January 09, 2021 @07:53PM (#25707000)
Just like shop owner shouldn't refuse to sell you something, because he doesn't like your hair color, social media company shouldn't refuse to broadcast your speech.

Note that this is different from tv or radio, because then the broadcasting company has to do additional work to broadcast your speech, but with social media the company has to do additional work to block it.

Edit: can't -> should't (sorry english is not my first language)

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by mreome on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:11PM (#25707170)
Businesses can refuse service to any person for any reason, unless the business is specifically discriminating against a person for being part of a protected class. Hair color is not a legally protected class last time I checked.
Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by konjin on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:16PM (#25707251)
The idea of a protected class is a fascist one.

A citizen is a citizen is a citizen. Everyone has the same rights and protections.

How the same people who complained about apartheid can then reinvent it in under 20 years is beyond me.

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by dang on Saturday January 09, 2021 @09:27PM (#25708153)
Please stop posting ideological flamebait to HN. Comments that take threads, and the site, further into hell are just what we're trying to avoid here. You've been doing this a lot lately, and we ban such accounts, regardless of which politics you favor or disfavor.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by m00x on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:18PM (#25707279)
> Just like shop owner can't refuse to sell you something, because he doesn't like your hair color, social media company can't refuse to broadcast your speech.

Might want to do research before arguing. This is incredibly inaccurate. Only discriminating against protected classes is illegal, shop owners can refuse to serve you for any other reason.

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by chr1 on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:30PM (#25707452)
I am not talking about laws in any particular country, but the way things would work in practice.

If you see a shop owner refuse service to a girl because of green hair, would you say "that's ok, not a protected class so she had it coming" or would you refuse to do business with that shop owner, and demand fair treatment?

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by grahamburger on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:06PM (#25707120)
> social media company can't refuse to broadcast your speech.

No, they don't. You might think that they should have to, but as things are today, they don't.

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by desigooner on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:07PM (#25707129)
Wait. Where were you when the baker refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple?! Smh..
Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by chr1 on Saturday January 09, 2021 @09:46PM (#25708461)
This is a good example too. A baker cannot be forced to do unusual or creative work he doesn't like, but refusing to sell pre-made cake, or refusing to do routine customizations (like selecting colour or text if these are always done for other customers), is wrong. So as far as i can tell from wikipedia article the decision of US court was wrong, and the situation republicans find themselves in, is in a way deserved.

I am not from US, and I think it's really sad that most people think, that by opinion on one issue it is possible to infer opinions on all the other issues. Social media makes it too easy to create echo chambers, and see only strawman versions of other sides arguments, freedom of speech and tolerance is the only way to heal the society.

Re:Mexico president slams social media censorship by CraigJPerry on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:08PM (#25707140)
It’s a private company. So long as it’s not discriminating on legally defined grounds, it’s free to do whatever the hell it wants.

The official broadcasting channels of the us gov remain fully open at Mr Trump’s disposal.